Talks, panels, and community discussions for audiences outside the classroom. This page carries the slides, sources, and supporting material for those talks, so that anyone who attended — or did not — can check the claims for themselves.
Flock Cameras, AI, and Democratic Control
Fredericksburg area: City of Fredericksburg, Stafford, and Spotsylvania.
This talk is not an argument that the cameras are good or bad. It is an argument that the question of how much surveillance power government should possess is a political question rather than a technical one, and therefore belongs to the public.
A camera records an observation. AI and automated computation turn immense numbers of observations into a searchable system.
That is why the privacy issue is not just the presence of cameras. It is the scale, retention, sharing, and searchability of the system they feed.
The surveillance question
What can the system do?
The democratic question
Did we ever decide that it should be able to do that?
Three Inquiry Areas
The Constitution tells government what it may do. We still have to decide what government should do.
Sources We Can Check
Official portals, the state statute, and one citizen-created map for comparison. These are the same four links carried by the QR codes on the printed handout.
The handout's fifth QR code — the “START HERE” code — points to this page.
What Virginia Law Gives Us To Work With
Local Questions for the Fredericksburg Area
Prepared for public discussion. This material is not legal advice. Court decisions and camera counts in this area change; where a claim is time-sensitive, check the primary source rather than relying on this page.
AI was used in the construction of this page — in drafting and assembling it, and in checking citations against their primary sources. The claims, ideas, and arguments are my own.